Rum Review: Dictador 12 year

dictador12pic

In the glass: Color is a medium amber maybe barely lighter in shade than the Santa Teresa 1796. Indeed there are a lot of comparisons to be made between these two rums. Swirling it generates thin medium fast legs.

Aroma: Only a little alcohol. Lots of caramel, brown sugar, something like a little varnish, but something older there too like some mold or vegetal aroma. If there is fruit in there it is old fruit. After sitting in the glass a few minutes the aroma dies back more fully than the Santa Teresa, but otherwise they are very similar.

In the mouth: Nice and smooth, a medium finish, not bitter. A little heat going down the throat just the way I like it. The rum is a little creamy again very close to the Santa Teresa.

Flavor: This is really why I’m comparing the Dictador 12 to Santa Teresa 1796. They are so similar here! When I first opened the Dictador rum my impression was that of pure milk-caramel, toffee, and brown sugar. But as sweetness goes, even fresh it is not very sweet despite the caramel and sugar flavors. As the bottle breaths a bit these dominant caramel notes settle down and the rum tastes remarkably like the Santa Teresa but a bit less sweet. Sugar tests confirm that this is a very low-sugar rum. Like that other rum, the flavors here seemed squashed together. There is an overall impression but I can’t tease individual flavors out of it.

Cigar Pairing: Interestingly the comparison between Dictador 12 and Santa Teresa 1796 breaks down here. The rum doesn’t seem to do much for the cigars I’ve tried with it so far. I’ve only tried a half dozen at this point, but most were cigars on which the Santa Teresa has some enhancing effect. I didn’t really notice much in any of these pairings, but I will update this if I come across something that connects for me.

All in all I would have to say that this is a good rum as rums go even if it doesn’t seem to suit my palate as a cigar compliment. But good is not great. Dictador 12 year is about $45 around me as compared to an un-discounted $50 or so for the Santa Teresa. If I find this rum discounted below $40 I might get it again, but otherwise, there are too many other rums that are less expensive and do more for the cigars!

Rum Review: Mocambo 20 year Aged

Mocambo bottle picture
Mocambo 20 year aged

In the glass: Very dark, rich burnt mahogany red perhaps the darkest single rum I have, a little darker even than the Gosling’s Black Seal! Swirled it produces thin fast legs.

On the nose: A little alcohol at first and acetone but minimal and disappear quickly letting the rum breath for a while. There is also dark molasses, burnt caramel (treacle), raisin and a rich clove-like spice, some chocolate, in rich combination that varies as the rum is rested and then sipped.

Mouth feel: Creamy but not overmuch. Smooth with but a little fire going down in a medium long sweet finish that keeps the cream.

Flavor: Wow, a burst of flavors in many dimensions but hitting high notes in molasses, treacle, dark brown sugar, tobacco, coffee liqueur, and milk chocolate. What I really like about this rum is that the flavors aren’t all squished together, you can taste everything and something different seems to pop out with every sip. There is oak in there underlying it all, and a lighter caramel seems to float in there too. The rum is sweet but only enough to be pleasant. I cannot find a sugar test for this rum, but I’m going to guess it will fall in the lower to mid range for added sugar. It is distinctly sweet, more than some, but nearly as much as other rums in my collection.

Cigar pairing potential: Superb! Goes with everything with the possible exception of very mild and lightly flavored cigars. I don’t think this would pair well with a “yard gar”. But do check this one out with a good medium strong and full flavored cigar. Brings out a lot of sugar, roastings, and leather in the smoke.

I think this is a very under appreciated rum. There are few reviews and no results in the sugar test lists that I have found. The bottle says “20 years aged” but I don’t know what that really means. The rum is only $35 at my retailer which puts it into the low-middle price bracket for me and I doubt it is all aged 20 years for that price. It is likely a solera style rum and so perhaps has some 20 year in it.

This was one of the first rums I really got into. My retailer eventually ran out and I was without it for a couple of years when I found it again. I wondered if I would still like it as much and I do! The one independent review I’ve found claimed the rum was “unbalanced”. Perhaps the reviewer did not appreciate the heavy notes in the flavor profile but I think they are great flavors and make the rum stand out. Especially as you can taste them all! It reminds me of the more expensive Dos Maderas 5+5 without the sherry notes. As usual I liked the rum originally because it went well with cigars I like and that continues to be the case. Among my less expensive bottles I will definitely keep this one around!

Highly recommended for cigar pairing!

 

 

Rum Review: Santa Teresa 1796

Rum Review: Santa Teresa 1796

Color: Medium amber, about half way between my lightest and darkest rums
In the glass: Thin fast running legs when swirled
Aroma: Mild, little alcohol, fruit like banana, apricot, brown sugar, caramel, tiny bit of acetone.
Mouth: Short finish, smooth with little fire, noticeably creamy.
Flavor: Compressed. There is brown sugar, some caramel, some other notes, perhaps oak, that all seem to be compressed together into a flat meld. The flavor is pleasant but doesn’t seem to have much depth and richness. Sweet, but not very sweet. Added sugar is low, between 0-7g/l so the rum’s sweetness is obtained legitimately.
Cigar pairing potential: Excellent! Goes with everything from light to dark, nutty and leather sweet, roasted vegetables, and flowers to darker chocolate notes. Does not go very well with extremely dark cigars like the Asylum Nyctophilia which gains nothing from it. Doesn’t work with very grassy or vegetal cigars either, but otherwise works with almost everything that has a little sweetness to it.

1796bottleSanta Teresa 1796 was the third rum I picked up some years back when my retailer ran out of Mocambo 20 and Pamparo Aniversario R.E. It was the same price as the second of these and I went through three or four bottles when the price went up and I stopped buying it. By that time, I had sampled and bought a dozen other rums.

At some point later on I found it on sale at another retailer at 20% discount so I bought a few bottles. I was surprised when I didn’t like it nearly as much as I had before. Perhaps the other rums had spoiled me even though they were, with a few exceptions, much less expensive! As described above it isn’t bad, just seems flat and one dimensional compared to other rums in the same and even lower price ranges. I wondered what would happen if I ever found the Mocambo or Pampero Aniversario again, and eventually I did. They both remained delicious to my palate so it was definitely the Santa Teresa. Still good, but not great.

But having gone through a third of this bottle now I remember why I liked this rum. It pairs superbly with most of the cigars I like. Anything with a little sweetness, nut, leather, or brown sugar goes great. I’m sampling it now with a L’Atelier La Mission 1959 and the result is very good! Will I pick it up again? At $55/bottle around here no, but if I see it for $42 again I will!

Rum Review: Gosling’s Black Seal

20160120_121615I’m always looking for a deal for myself and my followers and this rum might be the best deal of all.

Gosling’s Black Seal was supposedly named because the cap used to be sealed with a black wax. It isn’t any more, just a red plastic screw cap, but it does fit the bottle well and closes more securely than most of the pressed metal caps you find these days. Should have a cork of course, but then few rums at this price have that. Bottled at 40% ABV there is no age statement on the bottle.

20160120_134235A dark mahogany in color, it is not the darkest rum I have, beaten out by several others, but it is quite pretty. When you swirl it in the glass you get many thin legs forming that very slowly run down the glass blending together as they go. It looks thick. On the nose I sense tobacco, prune, raisin, a little alcohol, dark brown sugar, chocolate, and a little light molassses. There are no acetone or varnish notes telling me the rum has some age to it. There is creaminess on the tongue, but not so much as suggested by the legs. I am struck by a hint of black cherry which I haven’t ever noted in a rum before. Also brown sugar, and caramel medium finish. On the swallow there is a little heat but the rum is smooth. There is no bitterness in the after taste, and the rum gets a little creamier as the glass goes down. The major flavor notes seem to be the dark fruit and dark brown sugar. According to the master list of rums and their sugar content, there are only 11 grams of sugar/liter added to this one, a moderate amount, but by no means excessive compared to some.

All in all surprisingly complex and interesting rum if not quite as integrated as some. I’m not saying this is the best rum in the world, or even in my modest collection. But at $19 (BevMo in the U.S.) for a 750ml bottle it is the best bang for the buck out of all the rums I’ve tried in the last 4 years! It works well with cigars too. A Nyctophilia I smoked recently with it got enhanced charred sugar and woodiness out of it, while lighter cigars seem to get a little sweeter. I think there are better, more general, pairing rums but this will work and for the price, if you like rums at all, you have to try it. Would I buy it again? I already have!

Rum Review: English Harbour

It has to be said that I have grown very fond of this rum and mostly because it presents my palate with something different every time I try it. Perhaps that is the bottle itself evolving. I am about 4/5 through my first bottle of this rum now over about 2 months. That isn’t a lot of time for bottle-evolution, but enough, or perhaps my own palate has evolved into appreciating this sort of profile.

EnglishHarbour2verysmall The label says the rum is 5 year old Antiguan. That’s a good age for a rum, a little young of middle age. If this is representative of an “Antiguan style” I look forward to trying other examples. In the glass it is a light amber about like Barbancourt 5 Star (an 8 year-old). Swirled it forms thin legs. On the nose there is alcohol but not as much as in younger rums, and the acetone or varnish notes characteristic of younger rums are present but left in the background. There is apricot, some orange, and banana in the nose. I don’t notice any darker fruit but there is some nice woody sweetness in the background also so the fruit doesn’t overwhelm the nose like the orange does in Pyrat XO for example.

EnglishHarbourVerySmall On the tongue, sipped neat from a glencairn glass, it has a glassy crisp feel. Sometimes I detect a minimal creaminess and other times none at all. I get hints of brown sugar, and caramel but not the burnt caramel notes of much darker rums like Mocambo 20. A little fruit, orange and apricot, carry over from the nose. When first sipped, even after sitting out in the air for 10 minutes, there hardly seems to be any flavor at all, but still a detectable brown suger sweetness that goes down easy. The finish, at the beginning a little bitter, seems to vary from short to medium. It lets you know there is some alcohol there. As the glass is sipped the flavors seem to enrich and the rum gets distinctly sweeter and creamier.

One of the things that makes this rum so interesting to me is how it changes from the beginning to the end of the glass. Caramel comes into the flavor, along with a hint of warm spice taste like cinnamon and nutmeg. The creaminess is never very strong but it is detectable. Bitterness disappears from the finish which gets sweeter and longer. What starts out thin with bare hints of flavors becomes rather deeper with flavor hints that come and go with each sip. This is moderately priced rum. It regularly goes for near $40, but can be found around $35. I am struck by how at first sip I wonder if it’s worth that price, but by the end of the glass I know this won’t be my last bottle!

EnglishHarbour3verysmall As for cigar pairing, it works well with a Drew Estate Papa’s Fritas and L’Atelier’s la Mission. The nose alone brings out some extra sweetness in these cigars. It isn’t as generally a good pairing as some of my other rums but I haven’t tried it with every cigar I have either. As always, your palate may vary on this and it isn’t bad. Sometimes the cigar affects the rum more than the other way around! Try everything.

My scoring system is simple. Would I buy this rum again for $35-$40 or not? Yes I would. It is both tasty and real without the artificial notes of many other popular sipping rums these days. Good stuff!